ArticleJournal of family & community medicine
Knowledge and competence of primary healthcare physicians in the management of diabetes-related chronic kidney disease.
Article in Journal of family & community medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of primary healthcare physicians' knowledge of diabetic kidney disease.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring Primary Care Providers' Confidence in Managing Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes mellitus (DM) is a primary cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD), a significant and growing global health issue. Primary healthcare physicians (PHPs) are crucial in detecting, managing, and preventing CKD, but many lack the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively diagnose and manage the disease. This study assessed the knowledge and competence of PHPs in managing diabetes-related CKD. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted among all Primary Healthcare Physicians (PHPs) working at Primary Healthcare Center (PHC) in King Abdulaziz Medical City of the National Guard, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. An online questionnaire was sent to all PHPs and data were collected from January 2024 to February 2024. Data analysis performed utilizing RStudio (version 4.3.1). Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages, whereas mean and standard deviations were computed for continuous variables. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used to determine differences in confidence scores across various demographic and occupational characteristics. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors related to confidence.
resultsOf 141 PHPs, 122 filled online questionnaire yielding a response rate of 86.5%. responded. The majority (90.2%) were 18-45 years of age, 68.0% were qualified as family physicians, 38.0% belonged to the specialized poly clinic, and 54.9% had less than 5 years of experience. PHPs showed a varied levels of confidence and knowledge. While 76.2% were confident about the stages of kidney disease and 65.6% acknowledged the importance of the urine albumin-creatinine ratio (uACR) test, 58.1% were uncertain of interpreting uACR results and CKD diagnostic criteria. More than 60.0% were uncertain of the treatment steps postdiagnosis and prediction of CKD prognosis. Age, qualification, specialization in family medicine, and clinic affiliation were significantly related to confidence levels.
conclusionThe study underscores notable gaps in PHPs' knowledge and confidence concerning CKD screening, diagnosis, and management. Continuous education and targeted interventions are essential for the improvement of PHPs' competence and patient outcomes in the management of CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.