Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39619420›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2025

Dynamic contrast‑enhanced MRI combined with intravoxel incoherent motion in quantitative evaluation for preoperative risk stratification of resectable rectal adenocarcinoma.

Yaxin Chai, Yongchao Niu, Ruixue Cheng, Jianbo Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yaxin ChaiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, P.R. China.
Yongchao NiuDepartment of Magnetic Resonance, Xinxiang Central Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan 453500, P.R. China.
Ruixue ChengDepartment of Magnetic Resonance, Xinxiang Central Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan 453500, P.R. China.
Jianbo GaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal adenocarcinoma is a common malignant tumor of the digestive tract. However, it is difficult to obtain tumor microstructural information using conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) have been used in tumor research. The present study aimed to explore the application of DCE-MRI and IVIM in the risk stratification of resectable rectal adenocarcinoma. To achieve this, 75 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma confirmed via postoperative pathological examination who underwent high-resolution MRI, IVIM and DCE-diffusion-weighted imaging before surgery were retrospectively enrolled and divided into very low-risk (19 cases), low-risk (29 cases) and medium-risk (27 cases) groups. The quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI and IVIM were obtained using the GenIQ and Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit software, respectively. One-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to analyze the differences in the measured parameters between the different risk groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of each parameter. The differences in rate constant (K

Indexed as

adenocarcinomadynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagingintravoxel incoherent motionrectal neoplasmsrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID39619420
PMCPMC11605276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.