Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39619338›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Exploring how children and adolescents talk about coping strategies relating to loneliness using reflexive thematic analysis: a qualitative study.

Lauren Burke, Lily Verity, Laura Riddleston, Delia Fuhrmann, Pamela Qualter, Jennifer Y F Lau, Ola Demkowicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren BurkeManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Lily VerityManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Laura RiddlestonYouth Resilience Unit, Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Delia FuhrmannPsychology Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Pamela QualterManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Jennifer Y F LauYouth Resilience Unit, Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Ola DemkowiczManchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The prevailing view is that loneliness predominantly affects older adults. However, awareness of high rates of loneliness among younger populations is growing, prompting a call for interventions. The current study aimed to listen to the voices of young people regarding how they cope with loneliness, gaining a better understanding of how to then develop tailored interventions. Methods: Thirteen Arts-based focus groups were conducted with 74 participants (8-18 years old), in London, Manchester, and South Yorkshire. Reflexive thematic analysis was utilised. Results: We developed six themes as follows: (1) "Determinants of the coping approach for loneliness", (2) "Considerations to guide decision making", (3) "Coping strategies to alleviate loneliness", (4) "Social connection as a coping strategy for loneliness - considerations", (5) "Being active in your own coping success", and (6) "Worsening loneliness, coping strategies gone wrong". Conclusions: Participants described a partially sequential process in choosing coping strategies for loneliness, including effective and maladaptive choices. Effective strategies were highlighted, reflecting developmental stages with the need for self-motivation. Participants noted challenges in engaging in coping due to skill deficits. These findings are crucial for developing interventions specific to this population.

Indexed as

adolescentschildrencoping strategieslonelinessqualitativeyouth

Identifiers

PMID39619338
PMCPMC11604979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.