ArticleGlobal advances in integrative medicine and health
Clinician Experiences With Integrative Group Medical Visits for Chronic Pain.
Article in Global advances in integrative medicine and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mandela Yoga Group Medical Visit: A Culturally Resonant Public Health Intervention for Diverse Communities With Chronic Medical Conditions.American journal of public health · 2026Article
- Layers of complexity: a directed content analysis of implementation determinants for integrative group medical visits for patients with chronic pain in safety-net primary care.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Identifying Health Outcomes for Integrative Group Medical Visits for Patients With Chronic Pain: Results of Qualitative Interviews With Staff, Administrators, and Providers Working in Safety-Net Settings.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
- Heals on Wheels: Development and Implementation of Community Outreach and Group Medical Visits for People Experiencing Chronic Pain.Global advances in integrative medicine and healthArticle
- Implementing an Integrative Medicine Group Visit Facilitator Training Program to Improve Chronic Pain Management in the Safety-Net.Global advances in integrative medicine and healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The well-being of healthcare teams is an important consideration when seeking to improve patient experience and quality of care. Prior studies have found that changes to working conditions are most effective in improving clinician well-being. Integrative Group Medical Visits (IGMVs) modify working conditions in ways that have potential to improve clinician experience. Objective: The objective of this study was to understand healthcare teams' experiences with IGMVs. Methods: In this qualitative study, interviews were conducted via Zoom and telephone with 21 clinicians, administrators, and staff from safety-net healthcare settings throughout the United States (U.S.) who have implemented IGMVs for patients with chronic pain. Interviews included questions about clinician experience, well-being, and satisfaction with the IGMV model. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using thematic content analysis by a team of trained qualitative researchers. Results: The authors identified five themes describing how IGMV positively affected clinician well-being: organizational supports, human-centered engagement, collaboration with an interprofessional team, provision of guideline-concordant care, and enhanced meaning and purpose for the clinicians. Conclusion: The current study was the first to use interviews from healthcare teams who have implemented IGMV to assess their experience. The themes identified warrant further investigation into IGMVs as a strategy to promote clinician well-being and mitigate aspects of burnout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.