ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Monitoring hamstring and quadriceps strength using handheld dynamometry in patients after ACL reconstruction: A prospective longitudinal study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of pericapsular nerve group block and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block on postoperative recovery after hip arthroplasty.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Early sub-maximal quadriceps motor unit firing characteristics and six-month knee extensor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective longitudinal study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Strength data can help in guiding the return to sports (RTS) process in patients after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There is need for a fast, cheap, and portable method to monitor muscle strength in patients after ACLR in an ambulatory stetting. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to assess the use of a hand-held dynamometer (HHD) to monitor hamstring and quadriceps strength after ACLR and to assess the changes over time in patients tested at 3, 6 and 9 months after ACLR. It was hypothesized that patients show greater muscle strength at 6 months after ACLR compared to 3 months, and at 9 months after ACLR compared to 6 months. Forty-four amateur athletes (n = 44) after ACLR participated. Isometric hamstring and quadriceps strength were measured with a HHD at three time points during rehabilitation. Absolute isometric hamstring strength significantly progressed over time. Similar, absolute isometric quadriceps strength significantly progressed over time. This study showed that using handheld dynamometry can be a simple method to monitor the development of absolute isometric hamstring and quadriceps strength in patients after ACLR. Level of evidence: III, prospective case series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.