ArticleMacromolecules2024
Micellar "Click" Nanoreactors: Spiking Pluronic-Based Micelles with Polymeric Ligands.
Article in Macromolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomaterial Integration at Liquid-Liquid Interfaces for Green Catalysis.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- From Micro to Marvel: Unleashing the Full Potential of Click Chemistry with Micromachine Integration.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Engineering copper and copper-based materials for a post-antibiotic era.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the development of nanoreactors, such as micellar nanoreactors (MNRs) for catalytic transformations, has gained significant attention due to their potential in enhancing reaction rates, selectivity, efficiency, and, as importantly, the ability to conduct organic chemistry in aqueous solutions. Among these, the copper(I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) reaction represents a pivotal transformation and is widely used in the synthesis of bioconjugates, pharmaceuticals, and advanced materials. This study aims toward advancing our understanding of the design and utilization of polymeric amphiphiles containing tris-triazole ligands as an integral element for CuAAC reactions within MNRs. Specifically, our investigation delves into three critical factors that influence the reaction rate within MNRs: hydrophobicity, architectural configuration of the polymeric ligands, and their concentration. Utilizing the high molecular precision of dendritic amphiphiles, we synthesized polymeric ligands with two distinct architectures, namely, PEG-ditris-triazole amphiphile (DTA) and PEG-monotris-triazole amphiphile (MTA), and explored their CuAAC reactivity through coassembly with commercially available Pluronic P123 amphiphiles. The results indicate that the architecture and the concentration of the polymeric ligands play more dominant roles in influencing the reaction rate than the hydrophobicity of the dendritic blocks. Notably, while MNRs assembled from solely DTA showed a dampened reaction rate, spiking P123 micelles with DTA yielded an MNR with significantly faster rates. Moreover, P123 MNRs spiked with the synthesized MTA demonstrated increased CuAAC reaction rates compared to those spiked with the DTA, and they even outperformed the widely used Tris(benzyltriazolylmethyl)amine ligand. These findings provide valuable insights into the design principles of polymer-based ligands for constructing reactive MNRs and other types of nanoreactors for efficient catalytic transformations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.