ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024
Sequence labeling via reinforcement learning with aggregate labels.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sequence labeling is pervasive in natural language processing, encompassing tasks such as Named Entity Recognition, Question Answering, and Information Extraction. Traditionally, these tasks are addressed via supervised machine learning approaches. However, despite their success, these approaches are constrained by two key limitations: a common mismatch between the training and evaluation objective, and the resource-intensive acquisition of ground-truth token-level annotations. In this work, we introduce a novel reinforcement learning approach to sequence labeling that leverages aggregate annotations by counting entity mentions to generate feedback for training, thereby addressing the aforementioned limitations. We conduct experiments using various combinations of aggregate feedback and reward functions for comparison, focusing on Named Entity Recognition to validate our approach. The results suggest that sequence labeling can be learned from purely count-based labels, even at the sequence-level. Overall, this count-based method has the potential to significantly reduce annotation costs and variances, as counting entity mentions is more straightforward than determining exact boundaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.