ArticleJACC. Case reports2024
Brain vs Heart: Prioritizing Treatment in Left-Side Infective Endocarditis With Neurologic Complications.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A paradigmatic case is presented of subarachnoid hemorrhage as the initial sign of bacterial endocarditis on a mechanical cardiac prosthesis, in the absence of symptoms and echocardiographic evidence of infective endocarditis and vegetation. The presentation emphasizes the need to pursue a diagnostic workup for bacterial endocarditis whenever a patient with a mechanical prosthesis presents to the emergency department with focal neurologic signs. In addition, it highlights the potential use of second-level diagnostic tools to assess the extent of abscess presence and lesion extension to other cardiac structures for proper surgical planning. Finally, the presented case confirms that cardiopulmonary bypass surgery is not contraindicated and should not be delayed, even in the presence of extensive endocardial lesions with concurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.