ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Assessment of the quality of malaria surveillance and laboratory services for diagnosis in three districts of Gujarat state, India.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Surveillance is the backbone for the control of malaria and its elimination. In the state of Gujarat, situated in the western region of India, some of the districts reported a high annual blood examination rate (ABER) for malaria. Therefore, a study was conducted to identify the underlying reasons for the increase in the ABER for malaria. Methods: Planned investigations were carried out in three of the state districts, scrutinizing records of malaria forms and other epidemiological data collected during health worker surveillance, assessment of laboratory services, and rapid fever surveys. Results: The rate of fever ranged from 8 to 57% in the primary health centers that were surveyed. Analysis of epidemiological data revealed that malaria parasite positivity was more from passive than active surveillance. Increased ABER was accounted for by multiple factors, including blood slides collected during the mass survey and contact smears, which were included in the ABER and not mentioned separately. Blood slides prepared for the migrant population were included in the ABER, but the migrant population was not counted while calculating the ABER. Conclusion: The ABER in villages surveyed varied from 1.6 to 78%, which is mainly due to indiscriminate preparation of blood slides, i.e., without fever symptoms. Addressing the key gaps identified in data recording may aid in channeling the limited resources efficiently, thereby progressing toward malaria elimination. Adequate surveillance activities, along with systematic data recording, will enable timely, informed decision-making for the effective allocation of resources, ultimately supporting malaria elimination efforts in the state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.