ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2024
Guideline recommended statin eligibility and use among U.S. adults ages 20 to 39 years.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Guidelines for statin therapy emphasize treatment of adults ages 40-75 years, with less guidance for the treatment of younger adults, ages 20-39 years. Only two class 1 recommendations for statin apply to younger adults: 1) secondary prevention and 2) severe hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL). The implementation of guidelines within this age group has not been well studied. Methods & Results: Here, we use data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013-2020) to estimate statin eligibility and use among US younger adults. Based on this nationally representative sample, we extrapolate that approximately 923,000 younger adults had a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but only ∼24 % were on statin. Among younger adults in the primary prevention group, we extrapolate that at least 1.09 million had severe hypercholesterolemia. To expand on this analysis, we calculated untreated LDL-C values for individuals on statin using two methods, and we estimate that only ∼11-20 % of younger adults with severe hypercholesterolemia were on statin. Lastly, among untreated younger adults with a class 1 indication for statin, fewer than 25 % reported that a doctor or healthcare provider had recommended cholesterol medication. Conclusion: The implementation of class 1 recommendations for statin treatment in younger adults is poor. While efforts to improve risk prediction in the young have recently received significant attention, our results indicate that identifying high risk younger adults is insufficient. We must also improve guideline-recommended treatment in this age group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.