Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618915›Full record

ReviewJAAD international2025

Panniculitis in dermatomyositis: A systematic review of the clinicopathologic features.

Jonathan D Ho, Trimane McKenzie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAAD international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Panniculitis : Patterns and clues].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan D HoDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, The University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, Kingston, Jamaica.
Trimane McKenzieDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, The University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, Kingston, Jamaica.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Panniculitis in patients with dermatomyositis (PDMS) is rare. Objectives: Assess the clinicopathologic features described for PDMS. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE database was performed. We included cases with dermatomyositis (DMS) and confirmed panniculitis (histology/imaging). Extracted data included demographics, global region of origin, comorbidities, hallmark/nonhallmark features, muscle disease, panniculitis onset relative to classical DMS, symptomatology, physical findings, triggers, autoantibodies, extracutaneous involvement, histopathology, treatment, and prognosis. Results: Fifty-eight studies were included (91 patients). PDMS primarily occurred in relatively young women (mean age 35 years, female to male ratio 4.4:1). Adults predominated (adult:juvenile ratio 2.6:1). All had hallmark DMS features. A minority had nonhallmark findings. <1/4 reported extracutaneous involvement (pulmonary complications predominated). Cancer-associated disease was uncommon (7.4%). Panniculitis occurred before/simultaneously/after features of classical DMS. The clinical and histopathologic findings mimic lupus panniculitis, although lipoatrophy was uncommon (12.7%). A lobular/lobular predominant, lympoplasmacytic panniculitis was most common. Treatment regimens included combinations of systemic steroids/traditional steroid-sparers/Janus kinase inhibitors/biologics. The majority had a good/complete response (67.3%), but recalcitrant disease (22.4%) was reported. Limitations: Retrospective nature, inconsistent reporting of parameters, lack of longitudinal data. Conclusions: PDMS primarily occurs in females, mimics lupus panniculitis, and responds to therapy.

Indexed as

autoimmuneautoimmune connective tissue diseasedermatomyositisdermatopathologylupuspanniculitis

Identifiers

PMID39618915
PMCPMC11605401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.