Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618898›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of occupational and environmental medicine

Occupational Hazards, Associated Ocular Morbidities and Impact of Refractive Safety Eyewear among Agriculture Workers in India - A Two State Study.

Suresh Janani, Srinivasan Krithica, Sachi B Saranya, Shinde Lakshmi, Ram M R Nivethikka, Jathanna J Shefali, Subramaniyam Saravanan, K Eshwari, Ramesh S Ve, Asokan Rashima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Suresh JananiOccupational Optometry Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Srinivasan KrithicaDepartment of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Sachi B SaranyaDepartment of Optometry, Acchutha Eye Care and Institute of Optometry, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shinde LakshmiOptometry Council of India, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ram M R NivethikkaOccupational Optometry Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jathanna J ShefaliDepartment of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Subramaniyam SaravananDepartment of Optometry, Acchutha Eye Care and Institute of Optometry, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.
K EshwariDepartment of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Ramesh S VeDepartment of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Asokan RashimaOccupational Optometry Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Agriculture is one of the occupations with the highest risk of injuries and fatalities but the farmers are ignorant about eye care and eye safety. Aim: The current study aims at understanding the occupational hazard and ocular morbidities associated with agriculture and the effect of safety eyewear. Settings and Design: Multicenteric, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in two states of India: Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. Subjects were agriculture workers recruited by convenience sampling. Methods and Material: The study was done in three phases: Phase 1: Visual task analysis (VTA), Phase 2: Comprehensive eye examination, and Phase 3: Spectacle compliance assessment. The Standard of Living Index scale was administered to assess the socioeconomic status of the participants. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results: A study involving 276 workers (39.4% male, 65.2% female) found that VTA agricultural tasks were visually less demanding but hazardous, carrying the risk of ocular and nonocular injuries. Ocular injuries accounted for 9.4% (26 cases), while nonocular injuries accounted for 9.8% (27 cases). Spectacle compliance assessment revealed that 91.8% (157 out of 171 workers) reported improved visual comfort, reduced dust exposure, and enhanced safety with safety eyewear. Conclusions: This study illustrates numerous types of hazards associated with the occupation of farming. The study population had a 9.4% prevalence of ocular injuries. Refractive safety eyewear was reported to improve worker visual comfort.

Indexed as

Farmershazardocular injuryocular morbiditiessafety eyewear

Identifiers

PMID39618898
PMCPMC11606567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.