Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618834›Full record

ArticlePublic health action2024

Sputum culture contamination and associated characteristics in a diagnostic clinical trial, Papua New Guinea.

N D Tenakanai, J K Banamu, Y Lin, D Walsh, R Simbil, M Globan, A Penn-Nicholson, P du Cros, J Greig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health action, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

N D TenakanaiBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
J K BanamuCentral Public Health Laboratory, PNG National Department of Health (NDoH), Port Moresby, PNG.
Y LinBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
D WalshBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
R SimbilPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research (PNGIMR), Goroka, PNG.
M GlobanMycobacterium Reference Laboratory, Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory at the Peter Doherty Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
A Penn-NicholsonFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
P du CrosBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
J GreigBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingPapua New Guinea is a high-burden multidrug-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) country that reports low rates of bacteriological confirmation. Sputum drug susceptibility testing for second-line drugs is important. Access to culture is limited.

objectiveTo evaluate the prevalence of mycobacterial sputum sample culture contamination and determine factors associated with contamination.

designA retrospective analysis of data from a TB diagnostic accuracy study that used culture as the diagnostic reference standard. Data included characteristics of people with presumptive pulmonary TB who provided sputum, sputum quality and culture results.

resultsSputum (1-3 samples) was collected from 174 adults. The median age was 33 years (IQR 24-47). Of 337 samples sent for culture, 28% were contaminated. Contamination was strongly associated with samples self-collected by participants outside clinic hours (aOR 5.69; 95% CI 2.62-12.38). Contamination risk increased with delays in shipping to the reference laboratory (aOR 1.19 per day, 95% CI 1.10-1.29) beyond the minimum 3 days. Contamination was less frequent among people aged 35-44 years compared to 18-24 years (aOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.73). Sputum quality was not associated with culture contamination.

conclusionCulture contamination could be reduced using spot sputum collection, expedited submission to laboratories and faster shipping when required.

Indexed as

self-collected sputumspecimen transporttuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID39618834
PMCPMC11604157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.