Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618813›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2024

Non-technical factors on ophthalmology education: a narrative review.

Yang Jiang, Hanyu Jiang, Zhikun Yang, Ying Li, Youxin Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yang Jiang *Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hanyu Jiang *Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhikun YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ying LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Youxin ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ophthalmology education is increasingly influenced by non-technical factors. This paper examines the multifaceted influences on ophthalmology education, focusing on direct and indirect factors that have shaped the training and wellbeing of ophthalmology students and residents. A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was carried out, searching date was from inception to 01/07/2024. A total of 8,232 articles were screened, of which 7,976 were excluded following abstract review. After reading the remaining 256 articles in full, a further 228 were excluded. A total of 28 original articles were included in this systematic review. The non-technical factors that influenced ophthalmology education included various crisis, inadequate curricular time, training resources, lack of training standardization and shortage of financial support and teaching resources. The review summarizes the influences on ophthalmology education of various non-technical factors, thereby helping educators improve the training methods.

Indexed as

educatorsnon-technical factorsophthalmology educationtraineestraining

Identifiers

PMID39618813
PMCPMC11604451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.