ArticleCureus2024
Implementing Early Rehabilitation Strategies for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing acute exacerbations of COPD care bundles: evidence, effectiveness and future directions.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Lesson from COVID-19-Adapting Respiratory Rehabilitation Through Early Multidisciplinary Care: An Opinion Paper from Retrospective Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients afflicted with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently manifest acute respiratory failure (ARF), characterized by hypercapnia, hypoxia, malnutrition, muscle weakness, heightened work of breathing (WOB), recurrent acute exacerbations, reliance on mechanical ventilation (MV), and difficulties in the weaning phase. Early implementation of rehabilitation interventions holds promise in mitigating prolonged MV and, consequently, reducing intensive care unit (ICU) morbidity and mortality. METHODOLOGY: A prospective study was undertaken involving COPD type 2 respiratory failure patients receiving MV in an ICU setting. Random assignment was employed to allocate patients to either the experimental or control groups. Both groups received chest physiotherapy, range-of-motion exercises, and standard medical and nursing care. The experimental group additionally underwent early active rehabilitation exercises, including limb strength training and progressive mobility tasks. Various parameters such as mechanical ventilator duration, ICU length of stay (LOS), mortality, and occurrence of adverse events were documented. Group differences were analyzed using independent t-tests.
resultsAmong 52 patients, 33 were assigned randomly to each group using sealed envelopes. After withdrawals, 15 patients remained in each group. The experimental group had significantly shorter durations of MV (2.29 ± 0.61 vs 2.86 ± 0.66 days; 95% CI: -1.06 to -0.07, t = -2.37, P = 0.02) and ICU stay (7.66 ± 1.17 vs 8.86 ± 1.68 days; 95% CI: -2.28 to -0.11, t = -2.26, P = 0.03) compared to the control group. ICU mortality rates were similar between groups (1.93 ± 0.25 vs 1.93 ± 0.25; 95% CI: -0.19 to 0.19, t = 0.00, P = 1.00). The experimental group had a higher incidence of non-serious adverse events (0.66 ± 0.48 vs 0.26 ± 0.45 events; 95% CI: -0.04 to -0.75, t = 2.31, P = 0.02) and primarily transient physiological changes.
conclusionEngaging the early active rehabilitation exercises for mechanically ventilated COPD patients is practical and results in a reduction in MV duration, consequently shortening the ICU LOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.