ArticleCureus2024
Investigating Cesarean Section Trends: A Study Using the Modified Robson Classification in a Tertiary Care Setting.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Contribution of AIDA (Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm) to Cesarean Section Within Robson Classification Group.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe cesarean section (CS) rate is steadily rising in developed and developing nations. While CS is often perceived as a life-saving intervention, it comes with associated dangers for both the present and future pregnancies. The Robson criteria classify CS into 10 groups with further sub-divisions based on the gestational age, various pregnancy categories, prior obstetrical records, and the progress of labor and delivery.
methodsThis retrospective record review was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. A non-probability consecutive sampling method was employed to enroll all 1198 pregnant women who underwent CS delivery between July 1st and December 31st, 2022.
resultsA total of 2616 deliveries were performed during the study period; among these, 1198 (45%) were delivered by CS. Out of 10 groups of Robson Criteria, Group 5 emerged as the primary contributor to the overall CS rate, making up approximately 34.3% of cases, followed by Group 10, which contributed to 28.5% of cases. Group 2 contributed 16.4% of cases in total, with subgroup 2A constituting 12% of the overall rates, and Group 1 was found to be the fourth contributing category (5.1%), succeeded by Group 6 (4.9%), Group 4 (3.9%), and Group 8 (3.4%).
conclusionThe Modified Robson Criteria was found to be an effective and easy-to-comprehend tool, which assists in monitoring the indications of CS and aids in devising strategies to reduce its rates in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.