Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618762›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Change in Patient Perceptions of Electronic Communication Methods for an Orthopaedic Fracture Clinic Between 2019 and 2024.

Siddhartha Murhekar, Ali Soffar, Abdullah Khawaja, Aman Patel, Haritha Haridas Mandoth Veetil, Keval Patel, Thomas L Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siddhartha MurhekarTrauma and Orthopaedics, Princess Royal University Hospital, King's College National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Ali SoffarTrauma and Orthopaedics, Princess Royal University Hospital, King's College National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Abdullah KhawajaTrauma and Orthopaedics, King's College London (Guy's, King's College and St Thomas' Hospitals) School of Medical Education, London, GBR.
Aman PatelTrauma and Orthopaedics, King's College London (Guy's, King's College and St Thomas' Hospitals) School of Medical Education, London, GBR.
Haritha Haridas Mandoth VeetilTrauma and Orthopaedics, Princess Royal University Hospital, King's College National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Keval PatelTrauma and Orthopaedics, Princess Royal University Hospital, King's College National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Thomas L LewisTrauma and Orthopaedics, Princess Royal University Hospital, King's College National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Outpatient appointments are essential to patient care, yet rising non-attendance rates ('did not attend' DNAs) pose significant challenges, costing the National Health Service (NHS) over £1 billion annually. Traditional postal communication is inefficient and costly, while digital methods like short messaging service (SMS) and electronic mail (email) show the potential to improve attendance and reduce costs. This study investigates changes in patient preferences for orthopaedic outpatient communication methods between 2019 and 2024 at a busy district general hospital in London, UK. Methods A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019 and repeated in 2024. A total of 202 participants were involved in this study. A paper questionnaire was administered during fracture clinic visits, collecting data on electronic communication preferences, technology access, and missed appointments. Results The proportion of participants preferring email communication increased significantly from 68.89% in 2019 to 80.61% in 2024 (p < 0.05). Smartphone ownership also significantly rose from 66.32% to 84.46% (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in satisfaction with other-based communication across cohorts, but an increasing trend towards digital communication was noted (p > 0.05). Conclusion Patients show a preference for digital communication over traditional methods. Adopting email-based systems could potentially improve attendance and reduce missed appointments. Further research is needed to address privacy concerns and optimise communication based on patient preferences.

Indexed as

communication preferencesdigital communicationhealthcare technologyhealthcare technology adoptionmissed appointmentsmissed appointments reductionorthopaedic outpatient communicationoutpatient attendancepatient satisfaction with communication methodsprivacy concerns in medical communication

Identifiers

PMID39618762
PMCPMC11606633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.