Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618759›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Problem-Based Learning in North American Primary Care Postgraduate Medical Education: A Rapid Review.

Megan Clemens, Susan Avery, Russell Dawe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megan ClemensFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN.
Susan AveryFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN.
Russell DaweFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problem-based learning (PBL) in medical education is centered around a problem or case and is learner-led, involving small groups and problem-solving. PBL is ubiquitous in North American undergraduate medical education (UGME) due to reported learner satisfaction, efficacy, and long-term knowledge retention; however, its application to postgraduate medical education (PGME) is less defined. This review addresses the knowledge gap on the use and efficacy of PBL in PGME, specifically among primary care specialties due to their unique training needs, using the Kirkpatrick model as the theoretical basis for interpreting results. A search for articles using PubMed resulted in 17 selected articles that included primary care PGME learners undergoing at least one PBL session led by another learner. Learners were overwhelmingly satisfied with PBL, reporting increased confidence and comfort in the subject area. While none of the studies measured behavior change objectively, over half reported increased comfort in diagnosing, prescribing, and managing patients. This review extends the positive feedback found from PBL in UGME settings to apply to PGME and highlights the suitability of PBL for primary care due to increased confidence, learner satisfaction, perceived knowledge gain, and objective learning outcomes.

Indexed as

case-based learning methodsfamily medicine residencymedical educationpostgraduate medical education (pgme)primary careproblem-based learning (pbl)

Identifiers

PMID39618759
PMCPMC11608418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.