ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2024
Aberrant intrinsic brain activities in functional gastrointestinal disorders revealed by seed-based d mapping with permutation of subject images.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring brain activity differences in functional constipation using fNIRS: a case-control study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Activation likelihood estimation of convergent resting-state brain alterations in diarrhea-predominant IBS: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Enhanced interhemispheric functional connectivity in patients with functional anorectal pain.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The road to Rome IV and beyond: Evolution, refinements and future considerations for the Rome criteria for functional gastrointestinal disorders.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are characterized by complex interactions between the gut and brain, leading to altered brain function and symptom manifestation. We used neuroimaging meta-analytic techniques in order to analyze the correlation between FGIDs and aberrant brain activity. A systematic review was performed to ascertain resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) studies examining brain function in FGIDs. Pooled meta-analyses by seed-based d mapping with permutation of subject images (SDM-PSI) were performed to assess variations in regional brain activity, and sensitivity analyses were applied to evaluate the robustness of findings. Meta-regression analyses were then carried out to examine possible links between demographic factors and neuroimaging changes. Our meta-analysis revealed significant changes in regional brain activities among FGIDs patients compared to healthy controls (HC). Increased brain activation was observed in several regions including the postcentral gyrus, calcarine fissure/surrounding cortex, superior frontal gyrus, and insula, while decreased activity was noted in the left posterior cingulate gyrus, right median cingulate/paracingulate gyri, and the left caudate nucleus. Furthermore, meta-regression analyses indicated negative associations between disease duration and alterations in specific brain regions. These findings underscored the intricate interplay between gut dysfunction and aberrant brain activity in FGIDs. Early intervention and multidisciplinary approaches addressing both gastrointestinal symptoms and associated emotional distress are crucial for improving the quality of life of the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.