Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618656›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Interprofessional Education in Dentistry: Exploring the Current Status and Barriers in the United States and Canada.

Abdul Khabeer, Muhammad Ali Faridi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdul KhabeerUndergraduate Medical Education, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, CAN.
Muhammad Ali FaridiRestorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interprofessional education (IPE) is defined as the collaborative learning process involving two or more healthcare professions to enhance teamwork and patient care. While the dental profession plays a key role in patient health, its integration into IPE remains underreported. This review examines the current status of IPE in undergraduate and graduate dental curricula, focusing on barriers such as time constraints, curriculum gaps, and limited faculty engagement. Through a review of the literature, including surveys and studies, findings suggest that while IPE has been increasingly incorporated into dental programs, challenges such as inadequate curricular integration and resource constraints hinder its full potential. Moreover, although dental students express positive perceptions toward IPE, translating these into actionable outcomes remains a challenge. The review also highlights the need for innovations, including online learning and faculty training, to overcome these barriers. Recommendations include integrating IPE into clinical training, improving faculty participation, and leveraging technology to foster collaboration and ultimately improve patient care outcomes.

Indexed as

barriers to ipecollaborationcurriculum integrationdental educationfaculty engagementhealthcare teams

Identifiers

PMID39618656
PMCPMC11608076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.