ArticleCureus2024
A Case of BRASH Syndrome Required Two Hospitalizations in a Short Period.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BRASH syndrome, characterized by bradycardia, renal failure, atrioventricular (AV) nodal blockade, shock, and hyperkalemia, is a recently identified syndrome typically caused by the interplay of electrolyte imbalances and medications such as beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers. This report presents the case of a 79-year-old woman with a history of epilepsy and hypertension, managed with carbamazepine, lamotrigine, and antihypertensive medications. She developed BRASH syndrome following reduced fluid intake and worsening renal function. Despite treatment for hyperkalemia and dehydration, she experienced two separate episodes of severe bradycardia, both requiring hospitalization. The second episode was more severe, leading to the placement of a permanent pacemaker. Interestingly, the patient did not exhibit hypotension, which is often associated with BRASH syndrome, highlighting the variability in its presentation. Furthermore, the involvement of antiepileptic drugs like carbamazepine and lamotrigine in this case suggests that BRASH syndrome may not be limited to the effects of cardiovascular medications. This case underscores the importance of early recognition and comprehensive management of BRASH syndrome, particularly in patients taking multiple medications. It also emphasizes the need for further research into the pathophysiology, treatment, and long-term prognosis of this emerging syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.