Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618625›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Advancements in Imaging and Neurosurgical Techniques for Brain Tumor Resection: A Comprehensive Review.

Nidhi H Vadhavekar, Tara Sabzvari, Simone Laguardia, Thuslim Sheik, Varsha Prakash, Aseem Gupta, Indra Dhanush Umesh, Abhinandan Singla, Ikhlaq Koradia, Brando B Ramirez Patiño and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Subtotal tumor resection as a predictor of post-resection hydrocephalus in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nidhi H VadhavekarDepartment of Internal Medicine, D.Y. Patil University School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Tara SabzvariDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN.
Simone LaguardiaSchool of Medicine, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, ITA.
Thuslim SheikDepartment of Surgery, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, ARE.
Varsha PrakashDepartment of Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Aseem GuptaDepartment of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, GBR.
Indra Dhanush UmeshDepartment of Neurosurgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, IND.
Abhinandan SinglaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Government Medical College Amritsar, Amritsar, IND.
Ikhlaq KoradiaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rajiv Gandhi Medical College, Thane, IND.
Brando B Ramirez PatiñoDepartment of Surgery, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, MEX.
Humza F SiddiquiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumor surgery has witnessed significant advancements over the past few decades, resulting in improved patient outcomes. Despite these advancements, brain tumors remain a formidable public health challenge due to their high morbidity and mortality rates. This review explores the evolution of neurosurgical techniques for brain tumor resection, emphasizing the balance between minimizing invasiveness and maximizing precision. Traditional approaches like craniotomy and keyhole surgery remain crucial, but the rise of minimally invasive techniques such as endoscopic endonasal surgery and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has revolutionized the field. Awake craniotomy has been a substantial stepping stone towards the preservation of neurological function among brain tumor patients. Additionally, the integration of brain mapping technologies including intraoperative MRI, ultrasound and fluorescence-guided surgery has enhanced the precision of tumor resections, particularly in eloquent brain areas. These innovations, while promising, also come with challenges, including steep learning curves and limited access to advanced technology in certain regions. As the field progresses, ongoing research is essential to refine these techniques and improve accessibility, ultimately aiming to increase survival rates and preserve neurological function in patients with brain tumors. The integration of advanced imaging techniques refined surgical tools, and artificial intelligence (AI) in surgical planning is expected to further improve the safety and effectiveness of neurosurgical procedures in the future. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of current surgical strategies and explores potential future directions in brain tumor surgery.

Indexed as

brain tumor managementbrain tumor surgeryminimally invasive surgeryneurosurgery advancesneurosurgical techniquessurgical outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID39618625
PMCPMC11607568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.