ArticleCureus2024
An Audit of General Surgery Clinical Records (2021) in Ribat University Hospital, Sudan.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDocumentation is critical for effective patient management in hospitals, serving essential roles in improving patient care continuity, supporting clinical decisions, and fulfilling legal requirements. Comprehensive documentation not only aids in communication among healthcare providers but also serves as a vital record of patient history, facilitating accurate diagnosis and treatment. Clinical audits are systematic evaluations that compare current patient care practices against established criteria, helping identify deficiencies and promote adherence to quality standards. By increasing awareness of documentation practices, such audits can elevate the overall standard of clinical records, leading to improved patient care and safety. This is particularly important for healthcare professionals, as accurate records are essential for licensing and certification, as well as for demonstrating the delivery of quality care. PURPOSE: This study aimed to conduct a medical audit of inpatient medical records in the General Surgery Department at Ribat University Hospital to assess the documentation quality and improve patient outcomes.
methodsA cross-sectional study was performed on 518 long-stay medical records from Ribat University Hospital in 2021. A quantitative approach was used, employing a structured checklist of 26 points as the audit tool.
resultsDocumentation was largely incomplete, with significant deficiencies identified: patient full name (17.6%), admission policy (21%), admission time (2%), treatment plan approval (2%), and discharge summary (4.4%). Better documentation was found for admission dates (86.3%), medical histories (81.5%), and diagnoses (87%).
conclusionAccurate and comprehensive medical record documentation is essential for quality care. This audit revealed major areas needing improvement in the General Surgery Department, emphasizing the need for initiatives to enhance documentation practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.