ArticleHolistic integrative oncology2024
Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Article in Holistic integrative oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Photodynamic therapy of cervical cancer: a scoping review on the efficacy of various molecules.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare effectiveness of topical 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy (5-ALA PDT) and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent either 5-ALA PDT or LEEP from Sep. 2012 to Dec. 2019 in Chinese PLA general hospital. Patients' outcomes were compared according to the HPV genotyping, cytological tests within 3-6-month follow-up post-treatment, the pathological examination would be performed if the cytological results indicated the risk of CIN. Propensity score matching (PSM) was adapted to pair the baseline. Complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR) and the remission rate of HPV infections were used to evaluate the efficacy of 5-ALA PDT versus LEEP. Results: In total, 30 pairs were matched as the matching tolerance was set as 0.03. There was no significant difference about the CR and PR between 5-ALA PDT and LEEP group (73.33% vs 84.00%, Conclusions: In essence, topical 5-ALA PDT emerges as a non-invasive, repeatable procedure with minimal side effects for cervical lesions, preserving cervical structure. Overall, the efficacy of 5-ALA PDT is comparable to LEEP in achieving successful outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.