Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618548›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in dementia2024

The staff perspectives of facilitators and barriers to implementing virtual reality for people living with dementia in long-term care.

Joey Wong, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Winnie Kan, Catherine Wu, Mona Upreti, Mary Van, Alisha Temirova, Hadil Alfares, Kayla Wen, Vaishali Sharma and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in dementia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Joey WongSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Karen Lok Yi WongUBC IDEA Lab, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Winnie KanSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Catherine WuUBC IDEA Lab, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mona UpretiSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mary VanUBC IDEA Lab, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alisha TemirovaUBC IDEA Lab, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Hadil AlfaresUBC IDEA Lab, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kayla WenUBC IDEA Lab, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Vaishali SharmaUBC IDEA Lab, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Christine WallsworthUBC IDEA Lab, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jim MannUBC IDEA Lab, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lily WongUBC IDEA Lab, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lillian HungSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: One emerging technology in long-term care (LTC) is virtual reality (VR), an innovative tool that uses head-mounted devices to provide the viewer with an immersive experience. It has been shown that VR has a positive impact on the well-being of residents living with dementia, and staff are essential in the implementation and sustainable use of technology. Currently, there is a lack of inclusion and focus on direct staff perspectives on VR implementation in LTC. This paper aims to report staff perspectives on VR adoption in a 2-year study on a virtual reality program at three Canadian LTC homes. Methods: Our interdisciplinary team (clinicians, people living with dementia and family partners, trainees, and researchers) explored the facilitators and barriers to implementing VR in LTC, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and intersectionality supplemented CFIR. Twenty-one participants were recruited, including recreation staff, care aides, nurses, screeners, and leadership team members. The team collected data through staff interviews, focus groups, and ethnographic observation field notes. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify themes reporting the facilitators and barriers for VR implementation in LTC from staff perspectives. Results: The data analysis resulted in three facilitators and four barriers. Facilitators are (1) perceived VR benefits, (2) integrate VR into workflow and routines, and (3) partner with skillful VR champions. Barriers include (1) staff concerns about VR use, (2) financial burden and competing priorities, (3) lack of infrastructure and physical spaces, and (4) staff workload and limited leadership support. Discussion: This study contributes to the field with staff perspectives on facilitators and barriers to VR implementation. It underscores the rarely discussed aspects of VR implementation, such as funding prioritization and implementation timing. We offer practical strategies to inform future practices and research. Future studies should further explore long-term VR implementation, the involvement of family members as VR facilitators, and the use of VR in LTC.

Indexed as

Consolidated Framework for Implementation Researchdementiaimmersive experiencesinnovationnursing homestechnology

Identifiers

PMID39618548
PMCPMC11604463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.