Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618527›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2024

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Arthroscopic Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair Using Soft Suture Anchor without Posterior Portal Technique.

Napatpong Thamrongskulsiri, Pongsatorn Pholkerd, Danaithep Limskul, Thanathep Tanpowpong, Somsak Kuptniratsaikul, Thun Itthipanichpong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patients with preoperative bone marrow oedema benefit more substantially from medial meniscus posterior root repair.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Napatpong ThamrongskulsiriDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7045-3222
Pongsatorn PholkerdDepartment of Orthopaedics, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Danaithep LimskulDepartment of Orthopaedics, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5293-5428
Thanathep TanpowpongDepartment of Orthopaedics, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3971-8901
Somsak KuptniratsaikulDepartment of Orthopaedics, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7256-4057
Thun ItthipanichpongDepartment of Orthopaedics, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8640-1651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The medial meniscus posterior root tear is a common cause of knee osteoarthritis, often misdiagnosed. Surgical repair aims to restore knee biomechanics, with evolving techniques focusing on direct fixation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic soft suture anchor repair, without utilizing the posterior portal technique, for medial meniscus posterior root tears over a 2-year follow-up period. Methods: This is a retrospective study involving 32 patients, including 13 men and 19 women, with a mean age of 57 years and follow-up of 2 years. All tears were classified as LaPrade type 2 medial meniscus posterior root tears. The paired Results: MRI revealed complete healing in 17 out of 32 knees (53.1%), partial healing in 12 knees (37.5%), and signs of retear in 3 knees (9.4%). At final follow-up, the mean IKDC and Lysholm scores were 57.4 ± 10.3 and 84.8 ± 11.3, respectively, showing significant improvement from preoperative values ( Conclusions: Arthroscopic repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears using a soft suture anchor without a posterior portal yielded a high healing rate in MRI and favorable patient-reported outcomes in short-term follow-up duration.

Indexed as

ArthroscopySuture AnchorsTibial Meniscus InjuriesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMenisci, TibialMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeKnee arthroscopyMedial meniscus posterior rootPosterior portalSoft suture anchor

Identifiers

PMID39618527
PMCPMC11604554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.