ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2024
Central Bone Mineral Density Is Not a Useful Tool to Predict Bone Strength of the Distal Femur for Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knee-specific bone quality assessment for cementless total knee arthroplasty candidate selection: a narrative review.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Review
- Regional Differences in Knee Osteoporosis Based on Coronal Alignment Phenotype in Patients Undergoing Preoperative CT Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Validation of an Intraoperative Visual Assessment System Based on Bone Mechanical Properties for Selection of Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Asian Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Objective selection of bone mimetic materials using impact microindentation.Journal of orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Novel Visual Grade and Hounsfield Unit Predict Adequate Bone Strength for Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Central Bone Mineral Density Is Not a Reliable Surrogate for Assessing Suitable Bone Strength for Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-Energy CT Predicts Bone Strength Suitability for Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgroud: The increasing prevalence of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) necessitates a reliable assessment of bone quality. Central bone mineral density (BMD), measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the lumbar spine and hip, is conventionally used to estimate bone quality. However, its effectiveness in predicting the actual bone strength at the knee, which is crucial for cementless TKA, is under scrutiny. This study investigated the relationship between central BMD and actual bone strength at the knee. Methods: This prospective study included 191 knees undergoing standard posterior-stabilized TKA between November 2021 and March 2023. Central BMD was assessed 3 months before TKA, and the failure load of bone fragments collected during box preparation was directly measured using an indentation test. Relationships between central BMD and failure load as a measure of the actual bone strength at the knee were analyzed. Results: Linear regression analysis revealed a weak correlation between central BMD and the actual bone strength at the knee (R Conclusions: Central BMD measurements have limited utility in accurately predicting the real bone strength at the knee for cementless TKA. This study highlights the need for more specific and direct methods of assessing bone quality at the knee to ensure the success of cementless TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.