ArticleChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society2024
Machine Learning Models for High Explosive Crystal Density and Performance.
Article in Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Active Learning for Generalizable Detonation Performance Prediction of Energetic Materials.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Tri-1,3,4-Oxadiazoles Modified with Nitroimine: Balancing Energy, Sensitivity, and Thermal Stability.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Property prediction of energetic materials based on directional-aware graph attention network.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rate of discovery of new explosives with superior energy density and performance has largely stalled. Rapid property prediction through machine learning has the potential to accelerate the discovery of new molecules by screening of large numbers of molecules before they are ever synthesized. To support this goal, we assembled a 21,000-molecule database of experimentally synthesized molecules containing energetic functional groups. Using a combination of experimental density measurements and high throughput electronic structure and atomistic calculations, we calculated detonation velocities and pressures for all 21,000 compounds. Using these values, we trained machine learning models for the prediction of density, detonation velocity and detonation pressure. Notably, our model for crystal density surpassed the accuracy of all current models and decreased the root-mean square error (RMSE) of the previous best model by 20%. This improvement in model performance relative to past works is attributed to our handling of chiral-specified Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System (SMILES) strings and introduction of a new molecular descriptor, MolDensity. To elucidate descriptor importance, we evaluated interpretable descriptors in terms of importance and compared the accuracy of a statistics-driven machine learning model against a model comprised of descriptors typically assumed to control material density. The inexpensive, yet highly accurate predictions from our models should enable creation of future artificial intelligence (AI) models that are able to screen large numbers (>10
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.