Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618251›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2024

The Undetermined Significance of Screening for Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance.

Lindor Qunaj, Suzanne Lentzsch, Alfred I Neugut

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lindor QunajDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-8461-8374
Suzanne LentzschDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1708-7344
Alfred I NeugutDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-5949-4522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of premalignant lesions in solid tumors such as colorectal and cervical cancer has led to the development of highly effective population-wide screening programs for these malignancies. Although precursor clinical states are not well-established for most hematologic malignancies, multiple myeloma is a notable exception. Virtually all patients with multiple myeloma first develop monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), an asymptomatic but easily detectable condition. However, broad screening for MGUS has not been adopted primarily because there is no proven intervention to delay or prevent the progression of MGUS to multiple myeloma. Furthermore, the incidence of MGUS is poorly understood; a better understanding of its epidemiology will be critical in designing appropriate screening guidelines once an effective treatment has been developed. In the current issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, Ji and colleagues provide important epidemiologic insights on MGUS, including a critical discussion on how its incidence and preclinical duration vary by age and race, acknowledging that both MGUS and multiple myeloma are more common in Black than White populations. See related article by Ji et al., p. 1690.

Indexed as

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined SignificanceEarly Detection of CancerHumansIncidenceMass ScreeningMultiple Myeloma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.