Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618121›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025

Nurse-Administered Screening Tools for Detecting Elder Abuse in Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review.

Mohamed El Hussein, Dawson Sheehan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohamed El HusseinFaculty of Health, Community and Education, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9489-3254
Dawson SheehanMount Royal University, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

Alberta Innovates
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIdentify and describe nurse-administered screening tools used in emergency departments (ED) to detect elder abuse.

designA scoping review of literature published between 1999 and 2024 was conducted following the guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and a methodological framework for scoping studies.

methodsTwo reviewers, an academic faculty member and a senior undergraduate, conducted the screening and data extraction, aiming to identify studies using a nurse-administered screening tool in the ED to detect elder abuse. DATA SOURCES: The final search was conducted on 24 April 2024, using the CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Review databases.

resultsTen studies out of 145 met the inclusion criteria, identifying six screening tools that assist healthcare providers, such as nurses, in detecting elder abuse in EDs. The results were summarised and presented according to each screening tool. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Nurses in EDs are well-positioned to identify elder abuse due to the significant time spent observing and interacting with patients. The implementation of a screening tool can support nurses in detecting elder abuse and initiating appropriate interventions. IMPACT: Elder abuse is a widespread public health issue projected to increase continuously with the rapidly ageing population. Incorporating nurse-administered screening tool into EDs has demonstrated practicality and usefulness in identifying elder abuse cases. Various tools exist; however, these instruments are underutilised due to limited reliability and feasibility testing, with no definitive screening tool identified as the "gold standard" for elder abuse detection. Without formal screening, elder abuse is likely to remain undetected, leaving victims vulnerable to harmful consequences. Due to the limited testing and evaluation of a reliable ED screening tool for elder abuse, future research should focus on developing and validating a new screening tool intended specifically for use by nurses in EDs. REPORTING

methodThe EQUATOR guidelines for PRISMA were met. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contributions.

Indexed as

Elder AbuseEmergency Service, HospitalMass ScreeningAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39618121
PMCPMC12080097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.