ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024
Nomogram for predicting pregnancy-related relapse of myasthenia gravis.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Myasthenia gravis and pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Medication use trajectories in myasthenia gravis pregnancies: a population-based drug utilization study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Risk of Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbation During Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Neurology · 2026Article
- BCMA/CD19 CAR T cell therapy for refractory myasthenia gravis: Proteomic signatures and single-cell transcriptomics of disease flares.Science advances · 2026Article
- Association between antibody status and exacerbation in patients with myasthenia gravis who achieved minimal manifestation or better status.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMyasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease mediated by autoantibodies primarily affecting the neuromuscular junction. This study aims to identify risk factors for pregnancy-related MG relapse and develop a predictive model to improve clinical outcomes.
methodsWe enrolled 113 MG female patients with a pregnancy history during follow-up at Huashan Hospital affiliated with Fudan University, between January 2015 and October 2021. The study analyzed relapse rates and risk factors during pregnancy and postpartum using multivariate logistic regression. A nomogram was constructed to predict relapse probability, with model performance evaluated by discrimination and calibration metrics.
resultsOf the 113 patients, 52 (46.02%) experienced 115 relapses, including 52 (45.22%) occurring during the first trimester of pregnancy, 11 (9.56%) during the second trimester of pregnancy, and 52 relapses (45.22%) during the three months after delivery/abortion. Significant factors associated with pregnancy-relate relapse, included age at delivery/abortion (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.65), MG stable duration (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.63), thymic hyperplasia (OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.35-9.3), pre-pregnancy thymectomy (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.36), and inadequate treatment during pregnancy (OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.35-17.76). The Nomogram model demonstrated robust predictive performance.
conclusionThe first trimester of pregnancy and three months following delivery or abortion are high-risk periods for MG relapse. Younger ages, shorter MG stable duration before pregnancy, thymic hyperplasia, and inadequate treatments during pregnancy increase relapse risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.