ArticleEye and vision (London, England)2024
Establishing an objective decision criterion for intraocular lens exchange due to homogeneous calcification: a prospective clinical analysis.
Article in Eye and vision (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHomogeneous intraocular lens (IOL) calcification deteriorates patient's visual quality. There is a lack of functional and patient-reported data on patients with this material change undergoing IOL exchange surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate subjective and objective outcomes following IOL exchange due to homogeneous IOL calcification to improve evidence-based patient counseling.
methodsIn this prospective, non-interventional, clinical study, 53 eyes of 42 patients with homogeneous IOL calcification were included. IOL exchange was performed in 30 out of 53 eyes. Subjective symptoms using a quality-of-life questionnaire (Catquest-9SF), photic phenomena, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), straylight (C-Quant, Oculus, Wezlar, Germany) and contrast sensitivity with and without glare (CSV-1000, VectorVision, Houston, USA) were assessed before (T0) and at 3 to 12 months after IOL exchange (T1).
resultsPreoperative CDVA and straylight did not correlate. Average halo and glare size and intensity decreased and Catquest-9SF items improved. The CDVA rose significantly from 0.16 ± 0.13 to 0.05 ± 0.10 logMAR, and contrast sensitivity increased with and without glare. The straylight value decreased statistically and clinically significant from 2.32 ± 0.34 to 1.23 ± 0.33 log(s).
conclusionHomogeneous IOL calcification is not always associated with a pronounced reduction in visual acuity. In most cases, IOL exchange still reduces subjective complaints and improves quality of vision of affected patients. Visual acuity should not be the sole functional parameter in assessing patients with homogeneous IOL calcification as intraocular straylight and contrast sensitivity can better objectify patients' visual impairment. We recommend a straylight value above 1.56 log(s) as a cut-off when deciding on an IOL exchange surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.