ReviewBMC health services research2024
Transition for people with dementia from day respite services to permanent residential care: a realist synthesis.
Review in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Mind the gap: a systematic review of barriers, facilitators, and experiences of care transitions for people living with dementia and their informal caregivers.The Gerontologist · 2026Pooled it
- Unpaid dementia carers: a scoping review of the caregiving trajectory and changing short break needs.Frontiers in health services · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respite and permanent transition to residential aged care are processes that are designed to support preferences and needs of people living with dementia and their carers as the disease progresses. These services are highly variable in acceptability, accessibility, and availability for the caregiving dyad, often not reflecting a person-centred, co-ordinated and cohesive approach. This study aimed to use a two-phase realist synthesis to explore how respite and permanent transition models of care work in different contexts, through different mechanisms to produce varying outcomes.Phase 1 explored preliminary theories and assumptions of the respite care journey, including (a) identification of systematic reviews and innovative programs, and (b) semi-structured interviews sessions with key stakeholders. Phase 2 involved an iterative scoping review to identify and map the available evidence, with a synthesis designed to unpack underlying program theories of why, for whom and in what circumstances respite/transition models of care works.Phase 1(a) identified ten citations from 126 systematic review abstracts. Fourteen residential care managers participated in a contextual scan - Phase 1(b). Phase 2 expanded this knowledge, identifying a further 13 studies. Three program theories, at the macro, meso and micro level, were elucidated: (1) system-level evidence-based integration, through collaboration and co-ordination; (2) inclusive, quality care, with supportive environmental design; and (3) trust, autonomy, and meaning-making.A novel realist synthesis approach was used to explore respite and permanent transition models of care beyond 'what works'. Importantly, findings at the macro, meso and micro level context, suggest nuance, with a shared decision-making approach, is needed to optimise the ever-changing dementia care journey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.