ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2024
Opioid administration across racial and ethnic groups for patients undergoing liver resection: are there disparities?
Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRacial and ethnic disparities in the treatment of perioperative pain have not been well-studied, despite being observed in a variety of other medical settings. The goal of this investigation was to evaluate the relationship between race and ethnicity and intra- and postoperative opioid administration for patients undergoing open liver resection surgery.
methodsIn this single-center retrospective cohort study, adult patients undergoing open liver resection from January 2012 to May 2019 were identified. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were extracted from the institutional perioperative data warehouse. The primary outcome was weight-based intraoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MME/kg). Secondary outcome variables included use of neuraxial analgesia and length of stay (LOS). Multivariable regression models were used, which controlled for pertinent factors such as age and duration of surgery.
resultsThere were 1294 adult open liver resections included in this study: 532 (41%) patients self-reported as White, 401 (31%) as Asian, 159 (12%) as Black, 97 (7%) as Hispanic, and 105 (8%) as Other. The risk adjusted mean intraoperative MME/kg was not different among racial groups (White: 3.25 [95% CL 3.02-3.49] mg/kg vs. Asian: 3.38 [95% CL 3.10-3.69] mg/kg, p = 0.87; Black: 2.95 [95% CL 2.70-3.23] mg/kg, p = 0.19; Hispanic: 3.36 [95% CL 3.00-3.77] mg/kg, p = 0.97). In the multivariable models for secondary outcomes, length of stay was significantly higher for Black (estimate: 1.17, CL: 1.00 to 1.35, p = 0.047) and Hispanic (1.30, CL: 1.05 to 1.65, p = 0.018) patients relative to White patients. No racial/ethnic groups were significantly associated with higher or lower odds of receiving regional anesthesia.
conclusionsFor patients undergoing liver resection surgery, no racial and ethnic disparities were observed for weight-based intraoperative MME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.