ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
Single-character insertion-deletion model preserves long indels in ancestral sequence reconstruction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insertions and deletions (indels) play a significant role in genome evolution across species. Realistic modelling of indel evolution is challenging and is still an open research question. Several attempts have been made to explicitly model multi-character (long) indels, such as TKF92, by relaxing the site independence assumption and introducing fragments. However, these methods are computationally expensive. On the other hand, the Poisson Indel Process (PIP) assumes site independence but allows one to infer single-character indels on the phylogenetic tree, distinguishing insertions from deletions. PIP's marginal likelihood computation has linear time complexity, enabling ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) with indels in linear time. Recently, we developed ARPIP, an ASR method using PIP, capable of inferring indel events with explicit evolutionary interpretations. Here, we investigate the effect of the single-character indel assumption on reconstructed ancestral sequences on mammalian protein orthologs and on simulated data. We show that ARPIP's ancestral estimates preserve the gap length distribution observed in the input alignment. In mammalian proteins the lengths of inserted segments appear to be substantially longer compared to deleted segments. Further, we confirm the well-established deletion bias observed in real data. To date, ARPIP is the only ancestral reconstruction method that explicitly models insertion and deletion events over time. Given a good quality input alignment, it can capture ancestral long indel events on the phylogeny.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.