Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39617886›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Developing a model for clinical teaching with emotional intelligence.

Athar Omid, Fariba Haghani, Nahid Toufan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Athar OmidDepartment of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4251-0351
Fariba HaghaniDepartment of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. fariba.haghani@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0835-9523
Nahid ToufanDepartment of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical teaching is an essential part of medical education and clinical teacher must acquire the necessary competencies to perform such a role. In this regard, there is emphasis on emotional intelligence as an essential competency. The aim of this study was to develop a model for clinical teaching with emotional intelligence based on the experiences of clinical teachers.

methodsA workshop on teaching with emotional intelligence was designed and conducted three times. One month after, a sample of workshop participants (N = 18) was selected through purposive sampling and their experiences of clinical teaching with emotional intelligence were described using focus groups (n = 3) and deductive content analysis.

resultsA model consisting of four themes: preparation and start communication before round, sustained communication during rounds, promotion after the round, and managing social interactions throughout the presence in the ward were presented for describing clinical teachers' experiences.

conclusionIn this study, a model for using emotional intelligence in clinical setting was extracted. This model can be used in faculty development programs. A suggestion for future research is to examine the effect of using the model on learning outcomes and patient care.

Indexed as

Emotional IntelligenceClinical CompetenceCommunicationEducation, MedicalFaculty, MedicalFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleModels, EducationalTeachingClinical teachingEmotional intelligenceQualitative method

Identifiers

PMID39617886
PMCPMC11610071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.