SynthesisUpdates in surgery2025
Does indocyanine green fluorescence angiography reduce the risk of anastomotic leaks in colorectal resections? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for prevention of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a graded systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Pooled it
- Indocyanine green fluorescence to prevent anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Fluorescence-guided surgery in colorectal cancer: current evidence, quantitative advances, and future perspectives.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Review
- Deep impact analysis of surgical strategy changes guided by indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Observational
- Improving efficacy and safety of surgery in benign gynaecology: the case for indocyanine green.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anastomotic leaks are a significant complication in colorectal surgery. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) has been suggested as a method to reduce the risk. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of ICG-FA on reducing anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. This study follows PRISMA guidelines and is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022370748). We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases and registers for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICG-FA with standard methods in colorectal surgery. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers, with a third resolving disputes. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using comprehensive meta-analysis software, version 3. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed, and a sensitivity analysis was performed. The analysis included five RCTs with a total of 1369 patients from four countries. The ICG-FA was associated with a 45% reduction in the risk of overall anastomotic leaks (OR: 0.550, p = 0.012). Subgroup analysis showed a 47% reduction in leaks for low anastomoses (OR: 0.53, p = 0.143) and a 69% reduction in grade A leaks (OR: 0.31, p = 0.008). No significant effects were observed for grade B and C leaks, blood loss, surgery duration, hospital stay, mortality, postoperative ileus, reoperation, or surgical site infections. ICG-FA significantly reduces the overall risk of anastomotic leaks, especially grade A leaks, and shows a trend towards fewer leaks in low anastomosis. No significant impact was found on secondary outcomes. Further RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39617825What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.