ArticleExperimental brain research2024
After the n10: late oVEMP peaks in patients with unilateral vestibular loss and healthy volunteers.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials to Diagnose Vestibular Neuritis: A Scoping Review.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Ocular VEMP Using Bone Conduction Stimuli at the Forehead - A Pilot Study Comparing B250, Minishaker and Tendon Hammer with Vibrometry Validation.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) is a measure of otolith function. The initial n10 peak follows a contralateral pathway from ipsilateral utricle to contralateral inferior oblique muscle. Following the n10, a series of positive and negative waves are elicited in the inferior oblique, but their characteristics and generators are unknown. This paper therefore investigated the latency, amplitude, and laterality of these late peaks in patients with hearing or vestibular loss compared to healthy volunteers. oVEMPs were elicited to bone-conducted (BC) square wave pulses and air-conducted (AC) clicks in 63 healthy volunteers, 15 patients with profound hearing loss (HL), 45 patients with unilateral vestibular loss (uVL), and 10 patients with bilateral vestibular loss (bVL). In healthy volunteers, up to 5 peaks and troughs were elicited to BC bilaterally. The first two peaks were largest, and amplitude decreased linearly thereafter. In healthy volunteers stimulated with AC clicks and patients with uVL stimulated with either stimulus, the first 2-3 oVEMP waves were significantly larger on the side opposite the healthy/stimulated ear, while the later waves were smaller and had similar amplitude bilaterally. All peaks were absent stimulating ears with no measurable vestibular function. Late peaks were elicited in patients with intact vestibular function regardless of hearing status, demonstrating the vestibular origin of all peaks. Like the clinical n10-p15 waves, the second waves followed a dominant contralateral pathway, while waves 3 onwards appear to have a separate origin and may represent bilateral projections to the extra-ocular muscles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39617808What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.