Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39617795›Full record

ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2024

CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell lymphomas: outcomes and resistance mechanisms.

Tyce J Kearl, Fateeha Furqan, Nirav N Shah

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Application of nanobody‑based CAR‑T in tumor immunotherapy (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tyce J KearlBMT & Cellular Therapy Program, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Fateeha FurqanBMT & Cellular Therapy Program, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Nirav N ShahBMT & Cellular Therapy Program, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. nishah@mcw.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are an exciting curative intent approach to the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). Several products have received FDA approval for 2nd or 3rd line indications, and studies are underway for their use earlier in the disease course. These CAR T cells are ex vivo manufactured autologous cell products that specifically target tumor antigens to optimize tumor specificity and minimize off-tumor side effects-in NHLs, this is typically achieved by targeting B-cell antigens. Engagement of the CAR and corresponding antigen is designed to result in T-cell activation and subsequent tumor clearance. While curative for many NHL patients, too many patients fail to respond to or relapse following CAR T-cell treatment, and salvage options post CAR T-cell therapy are limited. Treatment failures occur because of myriad resistance mechanisms including CAR T-cell dysfunction, generalized immune dysregulation, and intrinsic tumor resistance. Focusing on patients with NHL, we review the clinical outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy and the major resistance mechanisms that lead to poor outcomes. We also review the many innovative and encouraging strategies that are being developed to improve CAR T-cell therapy for NHL.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, B-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansT-LymphocytesTreatment OutcomeReceptors, Chimeric AntigenBispecific CAR T cellsCD19Chimeric antigen receptorNon-Hodgkin lymphomaT-cell exhaustion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.