Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39617761›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Probabilistic photonic computing with chaotic light.

Frank Brückerhoff-Plückelmann, Hendrik Borras, Bernhard Klein, Akhil Varri, Marlon Becker, Jelle Dijkstra, Martin Brückerhoff, C David Wright, Martin Salinga, Harish Bhaskaran and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. PZT optical memristors.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Frank Brückerhoff-PlückelmannPhysical Institute, University of Münster, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Hendrik BorrasInstitute of Computer Engineering, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2411-2416
Bernhard KleinInstitute of Computer Engineering, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-5748
Akhil VarriPhysical Institute, University of Münster, Münster, 48149, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5948-4181
Marlon BeckerInstitute for Geoinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Jelle DijkstraKirchhoff-Institute for Physics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Martin BrückerhoffDEVK RE, Cologne, 50668, Germany.
C David WrightDepartment of Engineering, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX44QF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4087-7467
Martin SalingaInstitute of Materials Physics, University of Münster, Münster, 48149, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2228-6244
Harish BhaskaranDepartment of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX43PJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0774-8110
Benjamin RisseInstitute for Geoinformatics, University of Münster, Münster, 48149, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5691-4029
Holger FröningInstitute of Computer Engineering, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9562-0680
Wolfram PernicePhysical Institute, University of Münster, Münster, 48149, Germany. wolfram.pernice@kip.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4569-4213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological neural networks effortlessly tackle complex computational problems and excel at predicting outcomes from noisy, incomplete data. Artificial neural networks (ANNs), inspired by these biological counterparts, have emerged as powerful tools for deciphering intricate data patterns and making predictions. However, conventional ANNs can be viewed as "point estimates" that do not capture the uncertainty of prediction, which is an inherently probabilistic process. In contrast, treating an ANN as a probabilistic model derived via Bayesian inference poses significant challenges for conventional deterministic computing architectures. Here, we use chaotic light in combination with incoherent photonic data processing to enable high-speed probabilistic computation and uncertainty quantification. We exploit the photonic probabilistic architecture to simultaneously perform image classification and uncertainty prediction via a Bayesian neural network. Our prototype demonstrates the seamless cointegration of a physical entropy source and a computational architecture that enables ultrafast probabilistic computation by parallel sampling.

Identifiers

PMID39617761
PMCPMC11609296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.