ArticleScientific reports2024
Identifying accident prone areas and factors influencing the severity of crashes using machine learning and spatial analyses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling Farm Equipment Vehicle crash injury severity using random parameters logit and multi-class support vector machine in a developing country.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advancements in accident-aware traffic management: a comprehensive review of V2X-based route optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying accident prone areas and the contributing environmental factors can save lives and enhance infrastructure durability. This research presents an innovative use of two hierarchical clustering methods (Agglomerative Hierarchical and BIRCH clustering algorithms) to detect accident hotspots with high accident rates on the Yazd-Kerman road, in Iran. These approaches identified clusters of accidents, highlighting significant clusters and categorizing their overlap as two accident prone areas. The high percentage of overlapping results from both methods indicates a high level of consistency in the findings. Through observations, field visits, police report analysis, and interviews with locals, the primary causes of accidents in accident prone areas were identified. In one of the accident prone areas, the most significant reasons for accidents included the presence of a resting area, insufficient lighting at curves, and poor road signage, which created a dilemma zone for drivers. In another accident prone area, the main contributing factor was reduced visibility during dust storms. Then, K-Nearest Neighbors and Random Forests machine learning algorithms were employed to predict the severity of accidents, using various input attributes such as lighting, climate, alignment slope, and road geometry. The K-Nearest Neighbor surpassed the Random Forest technique, achieving an overall accuracy of 71% in contrast to 60%. This study effectively evaluated the outcomes of clustering, uncovering the underlying causes of accidents to inform future practical interventions. Moreover, by predicting the severity of accidents along the road, a framework was developed to propose strategies for risk reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.