ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2024
Biases in Routine Influenza Surveillance Indicators Used to Monitor Infection Incidence and Recommendations for Improvement.
Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monitoring influenza-like symptoms in the UK through participatory surveillance: Insights from FluSurvey over two winter seasons (2023-24 and 2024-25).PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Evaluating Analytic Approaches to Determining Respiratory Syncytial Virus Seasonality-United States, 2014-2024.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2026Article
- Applying the Moving Epidemic Method to Emergency Department Syndromic Surveillance to identify the Start of Influenza Seasons in New South Wales, Australia.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2026Article
- Article
- Understanding spatiotemporal clustering of seasonal influenza in the United States.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Analysis of influenza surveillance results in Sichuan Province in China, 2023-2025.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Interim vaccine effectiveness against influenza virus among outpatients, France, October 2025 to January 2026.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026Article
- Influenza A/H3N2 epidemiology in England during the 2025 to 2026 season: a mathematical modelling study.Communications health · 2026Article
- Inferring temporal trends of multiple pathogens, variants, subtypes or serotypes from routine surveillance data.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- How immunity shapes the long-term dynamics of influenza H3N2.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMonitoring how the incidence of influenza infections changes over time is important for quantifying the transmission dynamics and clinical severity of influenza. Infection incidence is difficult to measure directly, and hence, other quantities which are more amenable to surveillance are used to monitor trends in infection levels, with the implicit assumption that they correlate with infection incidence.
methodsHere, we demonstrate, through mathematical reasoning using fundamental mathematical principles, the relationship between the incidence of influenza infections and three commonly reported surveillance indicators: (1) the rate per unit time of influenza-like illness reported through sentinel healthcare sites, (2) the rate per unit time of laboratory-confirmed influenza infections and (3) the proportion of laboratory tests positive for influenza ('test-positive proportion').
resultsOur analysis suggests that none of these ubiquitously reported surveillance indicators are a reliable tool for monitoring influenza incidence. In particular, we highlight how these surveillance indicators can be heavily biassed by the following: the dynamics of circulating pathogens (other than influenza) with similar symptom profiles, changes in testing rates and differences in infection rates, symptom rates and healthcare-seeking behaviour between age-groups and through time. We make six practical recommendations to improve the monitoring of influenza infection incidence. The implementation of our recommendations would enable the construction of more interpretable surveillance indicator(s) for influenza from which underlying patterns of infection incidence could be readily monitored.
conclusionsThe implementation of all (or a subset) of our recommendations would greatly improve understanding of the transmission dynamics, infection burden and clinical severity of influenza, improving our ability to respond effectively to seasonal epidemics and future pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.