ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2025
Socioeconomic and Demographic Disparities in Keratoconus Treatment.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sociodemographic determinants of disease severity in a public healthcare system : Evidence from keratoconus patients in Austria.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Article
- Socioeconomic and Clinical Factors Associated with Keratoconus Severity and Follow-Up in a Tertiary Referral Cohort.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Publicly Available Large Language Models in Corneal Diseases: A Comparison with Human Specialists.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate healthcare disparities associated with keratoconus (KCN) patients receiving treatment (corneal cross-linking [CXL] and keratoplasty), as well as comorbidities associated with KCN.
designRetrospective clinical cohort study.
methodsA total of 3224 patients from the University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System (UI-Health) database from 2020 to 2024 were examined, including 1612 patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis of KCN, and 1612 ophthalmology patients as a control group. Multivariable and univariable logistic regression were performed to evaluate the associations between sociodemographic traits and rates of CXL and keratoplasty. Sociodemographic traits included age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, and neighborhood social vulnerability. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and manifest cylinder were used as indicators of disease impact. Comorbid disease rates were compared to a 1:1 distance-matched control group. Main outcome measures were odds ratio of undergoing keratoplasty and CXL, and prevalence of comorbid conditions.
resultsFemale individuals received less keratoplasty than male individuals (odds ratio [OR] = 0.55, P < .001). Black individuals received less CXL than White individuals (OR = 0.68, P < .05), as did individuals with Medicaid (OR = 0.27, P < .0001) or no insurance (OR = 0.41, P < .001) compared to those with commercial insurance. Individuals from socially vulnerable neighborhoods received less CXL (OR = 0.56, P < .01) and keratoplasty (OR = 0.66, P < .05). Black female individuals were the most vulnerable, undergoing fewer procedures than White female (OR = 0.58, P < .01) and Black male (OR = 0.65, P < .05) individuals. Black and Hispanic/Latin-X individuals presented with more severe disease (P < .01, P < .0001). Down syndrome was more common (P < .01), and diabetes was less common (P < .0001), in KCN patients.
conclusionsSignificant sociodemographic disparities exist in the treatment of KCN. Although further research is necessary, addressing these disparities is crucial for ensuring equitable access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.