Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39617003›Full record

ArticleNeuroepidemiology2025

How Many People Have a Huntington's Disease Expansion: A Population-Based Prevalence Study in Northern Scotland.

Heather Cruickshank, Zosia Miedzybrodzka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroepidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Heather CruickshankNorth of Scotland Regional Genetics Service, Clinical Genetics, Aberdeen, UK, heather.cruickshank@nhs.scot.
Zosia MiedzybrodzkaNorth of Scotland Regional Genetics Service, Clinical Genetics, Aberdeen, UK, zosia@abdn.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrevious work demonstrated a prevalence of 14.6 per 100,000 manifest Huntington's disease (HD) patients and 8.3 per 100,000 identified pre-symptomatic gene expansion carriers (IPGEC) in Northern Scotland. Many of those at high risk of having a huntingtin (HTT) gene expansion remain untested with the exact number being unknown.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to estimate how many people in Northern Scotland are at 50% risk of having a HTT gene expansion to help with HD clinic service planning and to calculate how many people could access an effective treatment if available.

methodsClinical and pedigree records from the North of Scotland Genetic Clinic were examined to estimate numbers of manifest HD patients, IPGEC, and individuals at 50% risk.

resultsThe prevalence of those at 50% risk living in Northern Scotland was 45.2 per 100,000 people. Every manifest HD patient in Northern Scotland has 4.4 relatives at 50% risk and every patient with a HTT gene expansion has 2.9 relatives at 50% risk. There are up to 415 (46.2 per 100,000) adults who could access an effective treatment if available, but this number is likely to be an underestimate as not all manifesting individuals seek diagnosis.

conclusionsDespite high predictive testing rates, at least 2.2 adults are living with the HTT gene expansion for every one of the 14.5 per 100,000 manifest HD patients in Northern Scotland. Regional variation in rates and ascertainment need to be factored into future service planning, including genetic counselling and testing, management, and treatment delivery.

Indexed as

Huntington DiseaseAdultAgedFemaleHumansHuntingtin ProteinMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceScotlandHTT protein, humanHuntingtin ProteinGeneticsHuntington’s diseaseNorthern ScotlandPopulation-based studiesPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID39617003
PMCPMC12688381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.