Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39616506›Full record

ArticleJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2024

Intra and Inter-Session Reliability of Movement Velocity During Pull-Ups Performed at Small Climbing Holds.

Cesar Sordo-Vacas, Amador Garcia-Ramos, David Colomer-Poveda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cesar Sordo-VacasDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Amador Garcia-RamosDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
David Colomer-PovedaDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe synergy between arm and shoulder muscles, along with isometric finger flexor strength, are crucial for climbing proficiency. However, tests often assess these factors separately rather than in a unified action. This study aimed to determine the intra- and inter-session reliability of the mean propulsive velocity (MPV) during pull-ups on a large hold and on small climbing edges.

methodsTen male climbers (self-reported maximal grade 6b-8b on French scale) participated in two identical sessions. During each session, participants performed two blocks of two pull-ups on a large hold and on four small climbing edges (25, 20, 15, and 10mm) in randomized order. The MPV was recorded using a linear position transducer.

resultsThe MPV during climbing pull-ups at 20mm (0.75±0.16 m/s), 15mm (0.73±0.16 m/s), and 10mm (0.52±0.15 m/s) was reduced compared to a pull-up on a large hold (0.84±0.16m/s). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were good-to-excellent across hold sizes for intra-session (ICC 0.84-0.99) and inter-session (ICC 0.73-0.96) measurements.

conclusionsThe results suggest that the MPV assessed during climbing-specific pull-ups on small holds provides valuable insights into finger, elbow and shoulder muscle force capacities in a unified action. This test could be considered a sport-specific test for monitoring performance in climbers.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalAdultHumansMaleMountaineeringMovementMuscle StrengthReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultField TestingFinger ForceGrip DepthRock ClimbingUpper-Limb Test

Identifiers

PMID39616506
PMCPMC11609558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.