Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39616381›Full record

ReviewPerioperative medicine (London, England)2024

Preoperative cognitive training for the prevention of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ka To Lau, Lok Ching Sandra Chiu, Janet Shuk Yan Fong, Albert Kam Ming Chan, Kwok Ming Ho, Anna Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ka To LauFaculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4152-3338
Lok Ching Sandra ChiuDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8218-2359
Janet Shuk Yan FongDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Science, Chinese University of Hong Kong,, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3369-6668
Albert Kam Ming ChanDepartment of Anaesthesia, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-161X
Kwok Ming HoDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6705-6004
Anna LeeDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, SAR, China. annalee@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2864-0045

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative delirium (POD) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) are associated with major morbidity and mortality after surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis determined whether preoperative cognitive training could reduce POD and POCD in patients undergoing elective surgery.

methodsEligible randomized controlled trials were identified from CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases from inception to April 30, 2024. Two independent reviewers extracted data on trial characteristics and risk of bias for each trial. We rated the quality of reporting of cognitive training interventions using the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) and evaluated the overall certainty (quality) of evidence using The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Random-effects models were used to summarize the treatment effect of cognitive training. Post hoc trial sequential analyses (TSA) were performed for POD and POCD to differentiate between "no evidence of effect" and "evidence of no effect."

resultsSeven trials (four high risk and three unclear risk of bias) involving 864 participants (mean or median age between 66 and 73 years old) were considered eligible and subject to meta-analysis. The quality of reporting cognitive training interventions was fair to moderate. Most cognitive prehabilitation programs were home-based, unsupervised, computerized interventions requiring 2.3-10 h over 1-4 weeks before surgery. Cognitive prehabilitation did not reduce POD (risk ratio [RR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-1.18; I

conclusionsCurrent evidence is insufficient to determine the beneficial effect of preoperative cognitive training on POD or POCD. Given the well-established benefits of long-term cognitive training on cognition in the elderly, the design of future cognitive prehabilitation trials should be adequately powered and incorporated with strategies to improve patient compliance.

Indexed as

Cognitive dysfunctionCognitive rehabilitationConfusionDelayed neurocognitive recoveryDeliriumNeurocognitive disordersNeuropsychological testsPostoperative cognitive complicationsPreoperative care

Identifiers

PMID39616381
PMCPMC11607966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.