Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39616369›Full record

ArticleEye and vision (London, England)2024

Microcirculatory parameters as risk factors for predicting progression of posterior staphyloma in highly myopic eyes: a case-control study.

Haoru Li, Nan Gao, Ruixin Li, Luobu Luodian, Jinyuan Sui, Yang Bai, Di Wu, Qing He, Yuxin Wang, Zhiqing Li and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye and vision (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Haoru Li *Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Nan Gao *Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Ruixin Li *Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Luobu LuodianTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Jinyuan SuiTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yang BaiTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Di WuTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Qing HeTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yuxin WangTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Zhiqing Li *Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Ruihua Wei *Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China. rwei@tmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-0355

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82070929Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project TJYXZDXK-037A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the rate of macular blood flow decreasing in adults with and without posterior staphyloma (PS) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and to identify risk factors associated with PS progression.

methodsThis longitudinal case-control study enrolled 122 eyes of 122 patients-64 patients with PS (PS group) and 58 patients without PS (NPS group). Participants underwent OCTA and clinical examinations at least twice, and those followed for at least one year were included in the analysis. Logistic regression analysis and machine learning were applied to explore the risk factors for PS and its progression.

resultsPatients in the PS group exhibited faster growth rates of spherical equivalent refraction (SER), axial length (AL), curvature index (CI), and posterior scleral height (PSH) as well as higher loss rates of choriocapillaris perfusion area (CCPA), choroid perfusion area (CPA) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) compared to the NPS group (all P < 0.05). The baseline SER (B =  - 1.291, OR = 0.275, P = 0.008), baseline subfoveal scleral thickness (B =  - 1.621, OR = 0.198, P = 0.046), baseline PSH (B = 2.959, OR = 19.282, P = 0.001) and foveal CVI changes per year (B =  - 2.776, OR = 0.062, P < 0.001) were the risk factors for PS. Baseline AL (B = 0.561, OR = 1.752, P = 0.033), parafoveal choroidal thickness changes per year (B =  - 0.094, OR = 0.910, P = 0.032), foveal retinal vascular density changes per year (B = 0.104, OR = 1.110, P = 0.013) and foveal CCPA changes per year (B =  - 0.214, OR = 0.807, P = 0.038) were the risk factors for the PS progression.

conclusionsDuring the progression of myopia in adults, changes in the morphology of the eye's posterior pole are not limited to axial lengthening alone; there also will be a phase of compensatory lateral expansion. Baseline AL and changes in the microcirculation can be utilized to predict the progression of PS.

Indexed as

High myopiaMacular curvatureMicrocirculationOCTAPosterior staphyloma

Identifiers

PMID39616369
PMCPMC11608478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.