SynthesisBMC health services research2024
A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence-based practice and its associated factors among health professionals in Ethiopia.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of job motivation and associated factors among health workers in Ethiopia.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Latent Profile Analysis and Influencing Factors of Clinical Nurses' Evidence-Based Practice Implementation: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Increasing the rate of nursing process implementation: a quality improvement project at Wollega University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, 2025.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Implementation of Evidence-Based Intrapartum Care and its Associated Factors Among Obstetric Care Providers Working in South Ethiopia.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based practice (EBP) entails utilizing the most up-to-date information to inform clinical decisions. Healthcare professionals at all levels are encouraged to integrate the latest research evidence to ensure high-quality care. In Ethiopia, there is a lack of comprehensive, nationally representative data on the prevalence of EBP among healthcare workers. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the overall prevalence of EBP and its associated factors among health professionals in Ethiopia.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The investigators searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, for studies published up to June 1, 2023. Two reviewers independently carried out the extraction of data and evaluation of study quality. We employed STATA version 14 for data synthesis and statistical analysis. The investigators used random-effects and fixed-effects models to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine the correlation between dependent and independent factors. The researchers conducted subgroup analysis to explore heterogeneity among the studies included and checked heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. The reviewers assessed publication bias using funnel plots and Egger's regression test.
resultsThe initial search yielded 215 articles, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of good evidence-based practice among health professionals in Ethiopia was found to be 47.64 [95% CI: 41.33 to 53.96]. Having a masters and above educational status [pooled odds ratio (OR = 3.11; 95%CI: 1.945 to 4.95], good knowledge of EBP [OR: 2.44; 95%CI: 2.14, 2.78], training in EBP [OR = 2.30; 95% CI: 1.91, 2.77], availability of EBP guidelines [OR: 2.05; 95%CI: 1.60, 2.61], internet access [OR: 1.79; 95%CI:1.47, 2.18], availability of free time [OR: 2.05; 95%CI: 1.54, 2.72], presence of administrative support [OR: 1.89; 95%CI: 1.34, 2.67], clinical experience > 5 years [OR: 2.26; 95%CI: 1.54, 3.33], and positive attitude towards EBP [OR: 1.87; 95%CI: 1.53, 2.28] were significantly associated good evidence-based practice in Ethiopia.
conclusionsDespite the importance of EBP in improving healthcare outcomes, its implementation among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia remains suboptimal. This study also identified modifiable factors associated with EBP adoption. Meanwhile, most of these factors are related to individuals and organizations. Strategies aimed at enhancing access to training and resources and fostering a supportive organizational culture are crucial for promoting EBP uptake and ultimately improving healthcare quality in Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.