Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39616324›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Exploring smartphone use and its applicability in academic training of medical students in Latin America: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Juan S Izquierdo-Condoy, Marlon Arias-Intriago, H A Nati-Castillo, R Gollini-Mihalopoulos, C D Cardozo-Espínola, Valentina Loaiza-Guevara, Widad Dalel-Gómez, Juan Villamil, Isaac A Suárez-Sangucho, Estefania Morales-Lapo and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Juan S Izquierdo-CondoyOne Health Research Group, Universidad de las Americas, Quito, Ecuador.
Marlon Arias-IntriagoOne Health Research Group, Universidad de las Americas, Quito, Ecuador.
H A Nati-CastilloInterinstitutional Internal Medicine Group 1 (GIMI 1), Department of Internal Medicine, Universidad Libre, Cali, Colombia.
R Gollini-MihalopoulosFacultad de Medicina, Universidad de Panamá, Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá.
C D Cardozo-EspínolaPostgrado de Medicina Interna, Universidad Católica Nuestra Señora de la Asunción, Asunción, Paraguay.
Valentina Loaiza-GuevaraFacultad de Medicina, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Pereira, Colombia.
Widad Dalel-GómezFacultad de Medicina, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Pereira, Colombia.
Juan VillamilFacultad de Medicina, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Pereira, Colombia.
Isaac A Suárez-SanguchoOne Health Research Group, Universidad de las Americas, Quito, Ecuador.
Estefania Morales-LapoOne Health Research Group, Universidad de las Americas, Quito, Ecuador.
Andrea Tello-De-la-TorreOne Health Research Group, Universidad de las Americas, Quito, Ecuador.
Cougar HallPublic Health Department, Brigham Young University, Utah, USA.
Esteba Ortiz-PradoOne Health Research Group, Universidad de las Americas, Quito, Ecuador. e.ortizprado@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile phones are essential tools worldwide, including for the academic training of medical students. However, their role in Latin America (LATAM) remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate cell phone use and its applicability in the academic training of medical students in LATAM.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted among undergraduate medical students from seven Latin American countries between December 2023 and February 2024. The study assessed academic smartphone use across five types of applications: medical apps, knowledge updating apps, academic podcast apps, video streaming apps, and social media apps.

resultsA total of 1,590 medical students participated, with 63.6% being women, 21.2% third-year students, and 55.0% from private universities. Nearly all participants (98.4%) owned a mobile phone, and 88.2% used them for academic purposes. The most common academic use was for viewing academic content videos (82.9%). A significant association was found between academic cell phone use and progression through medical studies, with fifth-year students being the most likely to use their phones for academic purposes (OR = 4.517, 95% CI = 1.843-11.075). Students in the clinical stage of education were also more likely to rely on smart phones for academic purposes (OR = 2.090, 95% CI = 1.500-2.911). Conversely, public university students were less likely to use their phones for academic purposes compared to private university students (OR = 0.714, 95% CI = 0.522-0.977). Additionally, students who perceived that their academic preparation would be more difficult without a cell phone were more likely to use it for academic purposes (OR = 2.157, 95% CI = 1.463-3.181).

conclusionsThese results suggest the importance of incorporating smartphones into the educational frameworks of medical schools and universities in Latin America, with a particular emphasis on academic video content applications, which already capture the attention and preference of medical students.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateSmartphoneStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLatin AmericaMaleMobile ApplicationsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAcademic useApplicationsCell phoneLatin AmericaMedical studentsSmart phone

Identifiers

PMID39616324
PMCPMC11607876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.