SynthesisBMC medical education2024
Systematic review-understanding the barriers and facilitators experienced by healthcare professionals in providing care for tics: a mixed methods systematic review of clinical knowledge, attitudes, and practices.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Caregivers of Children with Tic Disorders Regarding the Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment of the Condition.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Challenges in the treatment of Tourette syndrome in the Philippines.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025Review
- ImproviNg Tic services in EnglaND: a multi-method study to explore existing healthcare service provision for children and young people with tics and Tourette syndrome.BMJ mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tic disorders (TDs) have a prevalence of approximately 1%, and while various therapies have demonstrated effectiveness, people with tics and their families report a lack of understanding by healthcare professionals (HCPs). This systematic review included 13 papers featuring HCPs, people with tics, and their families about their experiences of either delivering or accessing care for tics, which were then divided into three themes. The first theme, Need for Education and Effective Implementation, suggested that while HCPs demonstrated good knowledge of tics, patient experiences indicated that this did not always translate to the care they received, potentially due to low confidence and a lack of formal training. The second theme, Misinterpretation, Misdiagnosis and Stigma, suggested that HCPs held incorrect beliefs about tics and would misinterpret tic symptoms, while caregiver responsibility for their child's tics would both positively and negatively impact care-seeking behaviour, partly depending on their cultural belief system. Finally, the Communication between Healthcare Professionals and Families revealed that poor communication of a tic disorder diagnosis can exacerbate anxiety within the family. The themes of this review were demonstrated universally, demonstrating that HCPs around the world should be encouraged to understand tics and tic disorders confidently to improve the healthcare outcomes and experiences of those living with tics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.